Photo Source: Dawn
National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS)
Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore
For any further information or to subscribe to GP alerts send an email to subachandran@nias.res.in
Pakistan Reader
Dr AQ Khan: Between a national hero and a nuclear proliferator
D. Suba Chandran
|
Dr Khan may have died a disappointed man on how the State treated him, but he would remain a hero for the nation
Undoubtedly for Pakistan, cutting across party lines and provincial boundaries, Dr AQ Khan is a national hero. Widely revered as the father of Pakistan’s nuclear bomb, he is celebrated within the country as the defender of security, especially vis-à-vis India, by providing much needed nuclear deterrence. In his mid-80s, Dr Khan passed away on 10 October, due to COVID-19 related complications. He was unwell during the recent months and has been facing health issues.
Dr Khan received a state funeral, buried with a guard of honour, and the national flag flowing at half-mast.
What would be Dr Khan’s legacy? There is a huge divide in how the people of Pakistan worship him as a national hero and how the rest of the world looks at him as a core of an illegal nuclear network and proliferation.
The Rise of Dr Khan: What we know and what we don’t?
The rise of AQ Khan was a fairy tale. With a degree in metallurgy from the University of Karachi in the late 1960s, he moved to Europe for higher studies. He received a post-graduate degree from the Netherlands in metallurgy and also a PhD from Brussels in the early 1970s.
The 1974 nuclear tests and the “eat grass but will have nuclear weapons” statement by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto changed the course for Dr Khan. Initially, he approached Bhutto; the latter gave space for Khan to establish in Pakistan. Later in the 1970s and during the 1980s, when the military took over Pakistan, Khan’s research activities should have shifted from civilian oversight to the military. Since the late 1970s, his research activities should have been under the purview of the Establishment. The 1980s should have been the most crucial for Dr Khan and his laboratories and also for their links with the Establishment.
Though there were serious concerns about Dr Khan’s efforts at the global level, especially in the US and Europe, the American engagement in the Afghan jihad in the 1980s forced them to look the other way. When the US administrations in the 1990s attempted to make a course correction in the 1990s with the Pressler Amendment, it was too late. By then, Dr Khan was well entrenched with his research, laboratories, and the Establishment in Pakistan.
When India conducted its second series of nuclear tests in 1998, Pakistan followed suit. Instantly, Dr Khan became a household name, a national icon, and a defender of Pakistan. By the late 1990s, after its founding father, Jinnah, Dr Khan should have been one of the most revered leaders of Pakistan. The late 1990s should have been Dr Khan’s absolute peak in terms of his popularity with both the state and the nation of Pakistan.
The Fall of Dr Khan: What we know and what we don’t?
After the 1990s, then came Dr Khan’s fall. Especially from the State.
When his rise peaked in the late 1990s, efforts to unearth his linkages with other clandestine nuclear and missile programmes across the world should have begun. Led by multiple institutions – government and academic, Dr Khan’s external linkages from Libya to North Korea were under probe. Questions were raised about how Dr Khan got the original designs from Europe. These international probes, led to his downfall. Like his rise, his fall was also dramatic.
When he made that confession in February 2004, the entire nation was shattered. Earlier in January 2004, he was arrested by the Musharraf regime for illegally transferring nuclear technologies and secrets to Libya, Iran and North Korea. His confession was on national television, broke the hearts of millions inside Pakistan. Though, years later, in 2008, he did regret confessing; however, the damage was done. The Musharraf regime placed him under house arrest in 2004. His movement was monitored and was limited; his meetings were also restricted. From a national hero flying across the continents, he became a prisoner in his own house. His movements became limited to court appearances and a few personal events.
During the 2010s, Dr Khan was thoroughly dissatisfied with the system. He wanted to be a free man, deciding his daily engagements. He appeared in numerous court hearings, asking for the same either directly or through his lawyers. From Gen Musharraf to successive democratic governments under Zardari and Sharif, the government kept Dr Khan at a distance.
Perhaps, the Establishment controlled his schedule, with the civilian administration had less to do. And this is something, rest of the world would not know – about Dr Khan’s linkages within Pakistan with the Establishment. While there have been numerous probes into the external linkages of Dr Khan, there were less or no internal investigations inside Pakistan on how Dr Khan and his labs worked with the Establishment. How the latter took over the national asset and outside the civilian control. Even if there were, they were silenced or never saw the light of the day.
A section believes Dr Khan died a hero for not only giving Pakistan the nuclear deterrence but also never revealing the nature of his linkages – internal and external. Perhaps, that is one of the reasons why he was kept under house arrest, despite his legal protests. His numerous petitions to the courts could never get him to be a “free man”, though for the government, he was a free man. In February 2009, the Islamabad High Court declared him to be a “free citizen”, be he never was free.
While Imran and his cabinet paid huge tribute to Dr Khan, he died as a disappointed man. A month before his death, in September 2021, he was admitted to the hospital and was unhappy about Imran Khan and his cabinet not inquiring about his health. Dawn quoted him on 13 September: “I am quite disappointed that neither the prime minister nor any of his cabinet members has inquired after my health.” Earlier in August 2021, after contacting COVID-19, he was admitted to the Khan Research Laboratories Hospital. His condition has deteriorated ever since. He even complained of not getting oxygen regularly. Dawn quoted him: “Sometimes they (doctors) give me oxygen and sometimes not.”
He was able to return home later in September, only to get further complications last Saturday.
He is buried in Islamabad. Along with him, some questions. He may have died a disappointed man on how the State treated him, but he would remain a hero for the nation. Let him rest in peace.
*Note: The note was first published in http://www.pakistanreader.org/
Bookmark |
Dhriti Mukherjee
Lawyers’ protests in Lahore: Two Reasons Why
Rohini Reenum
Protests in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir: What and Why?
Dhriti Mukherjee
9 May Violence: One Event, Different Actors, Multiple Outlooks
D Suba Chandran
The Fog of 9 May: One year after the anti-Establishment violence
Rohini Reenum
Pakistan and Wheat: From a Crisis to a Scandal
D Suba Chandran
Karachi: Seven Shades of Violence
Rohini Reenum
Recurrent floods in Pakistan: What and Why
Dhriti Mukherjee
Pakistan's Position on the War in Gaza
Dhriti Mukherjee
Pakistan's narrow tax base: Failures so far, challenges ahead
Dhriti Mukherjee
Profile: Street Crimes in Karachi
PR Team
The Snow Leopards of Pakistan
Dhriti Mukherjee
Pakistan grapples with soaring electricity bills and free riders
Shamini Velayutham
Pakistan: Recent spike in Polio cases
Dhriti Mukherjee
Pakistan’s power predicament: Soaring bills and public discontent
Ankit Singh
Pakistan’s Economy: Three questions
Sneha Surendran
From Cargo to Canvas: The vibrant world of Pakistani Truck Art
D. Suba Chandran
Que Sara Sara: Pakistan, Two Months After 09 May
Sneha Surendran
Pakistan’s e-Sport Industry: A Profile
Bhoomika Sesharaj
PR Explains: Pakistan’s power outage
Abigail Miriam Fernandez
Pakistan’s Blue Helmets: A long-standing contribution
D Suba Chandran
Karachi: The race and new alignments for the Mayor
Abigail Miriam Fernandez
Pakistan, US and Russia: Putin Online, Biden Offline
Abigail Miriam Fernandez
Deepening Pakistan-Russia ties
D. Suba Chandran
Justice Ayesha: Breaking the Legal Ceiling
Ankit Singh
Pakistan's Judiciary in 2021
Abigail Miriam Fernandez
Same Page Story: Civil-Military Relations in 2021
D. Suba Chandran
Pakistan's Foreign Policy in 2021
Ankit Singh
Pakistan’s economy in 2021: Major highlights
Ankit Singh
Pakistan and the Asian Development Bank
Apoorva Sudhakar
The PDM is back, again
Abigail Miriam Fernandez
Qureshi’s visit to Brussels: Three takeaways
Apoorva Sudhakar
Protests in Gwadar: Four major highlights
Ankit Singh
Mini budget, IMF and a contemporary puzzle.
Ankit Singh
Pappu Sain bids adieu to the world
Apoorva Sudhakar
Smog, pollution and more: Deteriorating air quality in Pakistan
Abigail Miriam Fernandez
PTI’s secret dealing with the TTP and TLP
D. Suba Chandran
PTI’s TLP flip-flop and a secret deal
Apoorva Sudhakar
The increasing curbs on digital media freedom in Pakistan
D. Suba Chandran
TLP: The government caves in again
Abigail Miriam Fernandez
TLP is back again
Apoorva Sudhakar | Project Associate, School of Conflict and Security Studies, NIAS
Pakistan’s transgender community: The long road ahead
Abigail Miriam Fernandez
Since January 2021: Why the US President has not called Pakistan’s Prime Minister so far?
Apoorva Sudhakar
No honour in honour killing
Abigail Miriam Fernandez
The Military Reshuffle: A strategic or routine decision?
D. Suba Chandran
Dr AQ Khan: Between a national hero and a nuclear proliferator
Apoorva Sudhakar
Rising child abuse in Pakistan: Five reasons why
Abigail Miriam Fernandez
Hazara Persecution in Pakistan: No end in sight
D. Suba Chandran
Protests in Gwadar: Who and Why
Juan Mary Joseph
Attacks on Chinese Investments in Pakistan: Who, Where And Why?
Apoorva Sudhakar